<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Fight the Fight &#187; Windoes 7</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fightthefight.com/tag/windoes-7/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fightthefight.com</link>
	<description>Nothing of Consequence</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 19:35:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Another Window(s)</title>
		<link>http://fightthefight.com/2009/05/another-window/</link>
		<comments>http://fightthefight.com/2009/05/another-window/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 18:17:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>B</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Netbook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OS X]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windoes 7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fightthefight.com/?p=1081</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So as bitched about Windows the other day, and even earlier today on Twitter, I&#8217;ve read another article about the Microsoft product that was interesting and pissed me off. Earlier today, I was a little incensed to read that signs are pointing for Windows 7 to be more expensive than Vista (link).  Usually, this type [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="margin: 10px; float: right"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/baron_indy/1601007304/"><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2368/1601007304_10109203dd_m.jpg" alt="Barrett Calhoon - Look at Windows Up Close" width="240" height="161" /></a></p>
<p>So as bitched about Windows the other day, and even earlier today on Twitter, I&#8217;ve read another article about the Microsoft product that was interesting and pissed me off.</p>
<p>Earlier today, I was a little incensed to read that signs are pointing for Windows 7 to be more expensive than Vista (<a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13924_3-10242555-64.html" target="_blank">link</a>).  Usually, this type of pricing for a new piece of software is normal.  But Windows is loosing serious ground &#8211; and Vista was seen as too expensive in a market where computer ownership is becoming cheaper and cheaper (not to mention free if you go with Linux).  I really want to build a windows box, but one of the biggest barriers is the cost of a transferable Windows license (only legit licenses here).  Why not price it just under Vista?  At the very least price it the same&#8230;</p>
<p>So what&#8217;s my latest gripe?  Basically, Microsoft defines the specs that a PC segment can not surpass to get certain deals on the OS per certain segments.  I didin&#8217;t know this before, but it makes sense&#8230;  And now, it pisses me off&#8230;</p>
<p>Basically the specs Microsoft has set for a machine to qualify for Windows 7 &#8220;netbook&#8221; pricing is complete crap.  <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5265894/microsofts-maximum-windows-7-netbook-specs-kinda-suck" target="_blank">Here&#8217;s the article (link)</a>.  Once you exceed those specs, the cost to license windows on that machine goes up.</p>
<p>Why is this a big deal, because it&#8217;s hindering the development of a new processor class in the Intel Atom that I happen to think could be a big deal if it were allowed to develop as a mainstream processor choice.</p>
<p>This policy guarantees that there will never be a dual-core Atom in a netbook.  That was a specific requirement for me to consider one.  Hell, Microsoft even hit reverse in terms of maximum screen size (12.1&#8243; for XP/Vista will become 10.2&#8243; for Win 7).</p>
<p>While we don&#8217;t know what the prices for Windows 7 will be, the price for a netbook license of XP is 1/3 of what a normal computer license is.  That&#8217;s a lot of negative things in a short while for someone who wanted to put a few Windows machines into a stable that&#8217;s primarily OS X.  Apple could hit pretty hard if they came out with their rumored netbook&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://fightthefight.com/2009/05/another-window/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

